Parseable MCP Server vs TeleKash MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Parseable MCP Server and TeleKash MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

P

Choose Parseable MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_datasets, get_dataset_schema, get_dataset_info.

Explore Parseable MCP Server Details

Choose TeleKash MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_probability, list_markets, search_markets.

Explore TeleKash MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	P Parseable MCP Server Developer Tools	TeleKash MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	Model Context Protocol server for Parseable. Lets LLMs discover and query Parseable.	Prediction market oracle for AI agents. 28 tools, 4500+ markets from Polymarket & Kalshi.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "parseable-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@parseable/parseable-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-server-75": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "telekash-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons