Paper Search (arXiv +… vs Source Library | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) vs Source Library
In-depth architectural comparison of the Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) and Source Library MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex)
Research · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Source Library
Research · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 41/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) if you need specialized Research tools running via a local process. Choose Source Library if your workspace requires Research integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
P
Choose Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) is categorized under Research and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Source Library belongs to Research using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) when you need capabilities focused on research and Source Library when you require tools for research.
Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) vs Adamamer20 Paper Search Mcp Openai