Academic Research Mcp vs Paper Search (arXiv +… | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Academic Research Mcp vs Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex)
In-depth architectural comparison of the Academic Research Mcp and Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Academic Research Mcp
Research · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex)
Research · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Academic Research Mcp if you need specialized Research tools running via a local process. Choose Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) if your workspace requires Research integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
A
Choose Academic Research Mcp when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Academic Research Mcp is categorized under Research and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) belongs to Research using local stdio subprocess. Select Academic Research Mcp when you need capabilities focused on research and Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) when you require tools for research.
Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) vs Adamamer20 Paper Search Mcp Openai