Paper Search (arXiv +… vs Semanticscholar | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) vs Semanticscholar
In-depth architectural comparison of the Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) and Semanticscholar MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex)
Research · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Semanticscholar
Research · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) if you need specialized Research tools running via a local process. Choose Semanticscholar if your workspace requires Research integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
P
Choose Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) is categorized under Research and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Semanticscholar belongs to Research using local stdio subprocess. Select Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) when you need capabilities focused on research and Semanticscholar when you require tools for research.
Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) vs Adamamer20 Paper Search Mcp Openai