Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) vs BrowseAI Dev
In-depth architectural comparison of the Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) and BrowseAI Dev MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex)
Research · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 51/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
BrowseAI Dev
Research · Local stdio
Quality: 59/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) if you need specialized Research tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose BrowseAI Dev if your workspace requires Research integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) is categorized under Research and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, BrowseAI Dev belongs to Research using local stdio subprocess. Select Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) when you need capabilities focused on research and BrowseAI Dev when you require tools for research.