BrowseAI Dev vs Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex)
In-depth architectural comparison of the BrowseAI Dev and Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
BrowseAI Dev
Research · Local stdio
Quality: 59/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex)
Research · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 51/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose BrowseAI Dev if you need specialized Research tools running via a local process. Choose Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) if your workspace requires Research integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose BrowseAI Dev when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
BrowseAI Dev is categorized under Research and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) belongs to Research using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select BrowseAI Dev when you need capabilities focused on research and Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) when you require tools for research.