OmniFocus vs Vidalytics MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the OmniFocus and Vidalytics MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

O

Choose OmniFocus when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_projects, get_project, list_tasks.

Explore OmniFocus Details

Choose Vidalytics MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: set_user_context, list_videos, get_video.

Explore Vidalytics MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	O OmniFocus Developer Tools	Vidalytics MCP vidalytics Developer Tools
Summary	Full CRUD MCP server for OmniFocus via Omni Automation — tasks, projects, folders, tags, recurrence.	Manage your Vidalytics videos and analytics from your AI assistant.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "omnifocus": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@scardis/omnifocus-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-272": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@vidalytics/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons