Clio MCP vs Vidalytics MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Clio MCP and Vidalytics MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Clio MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: authenticate, auth_status, logout.

Explore Clio MCP Details

Choose Vidalytics MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: set_user_context, list_videos, get_video.

Explore Vidalytics MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Clio MCP Developer Tools	Vidalytics MCP vidalytics Developer Tools
Summary	Connect Claude to Clio with 15 tools for matters, contacts, tasks, billing, and more.	Manage your Vidalytics videos and analytics from your AI assistant.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "clio-mcp-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "invocation"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-272": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@vidalytics/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons