Nodriver — undetected… vs Browser Gateway | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Nodriver — undetected browser automation vs Browser Gateway
In-depth architectural comparison of the Nodriver — undetected browser automation and Browser Gateway MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Nodriver — undetected browser automation
Browser Automation · Local stdio
Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Browser Gateway
Browser Automation · Local stdio
Quality: 48/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Nodriver — undetected browser automation if you need specialized Browser Automation tools running via a local process. Choose Browser Gateway if your workspace requires Browser Automation integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Nodriver — undetected browser automation is categorized under Browser Automation and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Browser Gateway belongs to Browser Automation using local stdio subprocess. Select Nodriver — undetected browser automation when you need capabilities focused on browser automation and Browser Gateway when you require tools for browser automation.