N3mo vs Source Map Parser MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the N3mo and Source Map Parser MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose N3mo when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore N3mo Details

Choose Source Map Parser MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Source Map Parser MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	N3mo Developer Tools	Source Map Parser MCP Developer Tools
Summary	N3MO: Code intelligence engine mapping repositories into queryable symbol graphs.	Parse JavaScript error stack traces back to original source code using source maps
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "n3mo": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "n3mo"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "source-map-parser-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "source-map-parser-mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons