Mobile Device MCP vs Hypruse

In-depth architectural comparison of the Mobile Device MCP and Hypruse MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

M

Choose Mobile Device MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_devices, screenshot, uitree.

Explore Mobile Device MCP Details

Choose Hypruse when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: desktop, screenshot, zoom.

Explore Hypruse Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	M Mobile Device MCP Developer Tools	Hypruse Developer Tools
Summary	Control iOS and Android devices with multi-device and seamless Native/WebView support.	Computer use for Hyprland: semantic desktop state over IPC, plus vision and native input
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mobile-device-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@srmorete/mobile-device-mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hypruse": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "hypruse"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons