MemoryGuard vs Rmbr

In-depth architectural comparison of the MemoryGuard and Rmbr MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

M

Choose MemoryGuard when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MemoryGuard Details

Choose Rmbr when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Rmbr Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	M MemoryGuard Knowledge & Memory	Rmbr Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Local-first governed MCP memory backend for coding agents.	Embedded, local-first memory and retrieval for AI agents. One SQLite file, no server, no API key.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "memoryguard-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "memoryguard-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "rmbr": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "rmbr"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons