Memory Vault vs Mcp Server Duckdb

In-depth architectural comparison of the Memory Vault and Mcp Server Duckdb MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

M

Choose Memory Vault when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Memory Vault Details

Choose Mcp Server Duckdb when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: query, Input, Output.

Explore Mcp Server Duckdb Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	M Memory Vault Databases	Mcp Server Duckdb ktanaka101 Databases
Summary	Local-first AI memory layer with hybrid search. Postgres + pgvector. Self-hosted, MIT.	DuckDB database integration with schema inspection and query capabilities
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "memory-vault": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "memory-vault"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ktanaka101-mcp-server-duckdb": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@smithery/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons