MCP Wan vs MCP Kling

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Wan and MCP Kling MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Wan when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Multimedia Process domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: wan_generate_video, wan_generate_video_from_image, wan_get_task.

Explore MCP Wan Details

Choose MCP Kling when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Multimedia Process domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: kling_generate_video, kling_generate_video_from_image, kling_extend_video.

Explore MCP Kling Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Wan Multimedia Process	MCP Kling Multimedia Process
Summary	MCP server for Wan AI video generation via AceDataCloud API	MCP server for Kling AI video generation
Category & Scope	Multimedia Process	Multimedia Process
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-wan": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-wan"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-kling": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-kling"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons