MCP Seedance vs MCP Wan

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Seedance and MCP Wan MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Seedance when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Multimedia Process domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: seedance_generate_video, seedance_generate_video_from_image, seedance_get_task.

Explore MCP Seedance Details

Choose MCP Wan when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Multimedia Process domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: wan_generate_video, wan_generate_video_from_image, wan_get_task.

Explore MCP Wan Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Seedance Multimedia Process	MCP Wan Multimedia Process
Summary	MCP server for ByteDance Seedance AI video generation	MCP server for Wan AI video generation via AceDataCloud API
Category & Scope	Multimedia Process	Multimedia Process
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-seedance": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-seedance"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-wan": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-wan"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons