MCP Uptime Kuma vs UptimeRobot — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
MCP Uptime Kuma vs UptimeRobot
A side-by-side look at the MCP Uptime Kuma and UptimeRobot MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose MCP Uptime Kuma for monitoring work as a local process; choose UptimeRobot for monitoring over a hosted endpoint. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose MCP Uptime Kuma when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
You have the keys it needs: UPTIME_KUMA_URL, UPTIME_KUMA_USERNAME, UPTIME_KUMA_PASSWORD, UPTIME_KUMA_2FA_TOKEN, UPTIME_KUMA_JWT_TOKEN, UPTIME_KUMA_HEADERS.
You want tools like getMonitorSummary, listMonitors, listMonitorTypes.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
MCP Uptime Kuma is categorized under Monitoring and uses a local stdio subprocess. UptimeRobot belongs to Monitoring and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Pick MCP Uptime Kuma for monitoring work and UptimeRobot for monitoring.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
MCP Uptime Kuma has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. UptimeRobot has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add mcp-uptime-kuma and uptimerobot as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, MCP Uptime Kuma has a quality signal of 60/100 (Good) with 1 views, 0 installs and 55 GitHub stars. UptimeRobot has 37/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 24 GitHub stars.