What is the key difference between MCP Tomticket and Atera?

MCP Tomticket belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while Atera belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution.

How do I install MCP Tomticket or Atera in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are MCP Tomticket and Atera free or paid?

MCP Tomticket operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Atera operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

MCP Tomticket lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Atera lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both MCP Tomticket and Atera together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

MCP Tomticket vs Atera

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Tomticket and Atera MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

MCP Tomticket

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 35/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Atera

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 35/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose MCP Tomticket if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Atera if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Tomticket when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP Tomticket Details

Choose Atera when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Atera Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Tomticket Developer Tools	Atera Developer Tools
Summary	TomTicket helpdesk MCP: tickets, replies, time, customers, chats, and KB	MCP server for Atera RMM — customers, tickets, and more.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

MCP Tomticket Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Atera Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

MCP Tomticket Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-tomticket": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-tomticket"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Atera Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "atera": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "@wyre-ai/atera-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

MCP Tomticket is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Atera belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select MCP Tomticket when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Atera when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to MCP Tomticket More alternatives to Atera Developer Tools category hub Canonical compare URL