MCP Seatbelt vs Apktool MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Seatbelt and Apktool MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Seatbelt when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP Seatbelt Details

Choose Apktool MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: PATH.
• Primary tools included: Decode APKs to smali and resources using Apk Tool, List and retrieve smali files and directories, Modify smali and resource files with AI assistance.

Explore Apktool MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Seatbelt Security	Apktool MCP Server zinja-coder Security
Summary
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-seatbelt": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@kryptosai/mcp-seatbelt"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "zinja-coder-apktool-mcp-server": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "httpx"
      ],
      "env": {
        "PATH": "YOUR_PATH_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons