MCP Request Tracker vs Opendock

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Request Tracker and Opendock MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Request Tracker when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP Request Tracker Details

Choose Opendock when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Opendock Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Request Tracker Developer Tools	Opendock Developer Tools
Summary	Secure MCP server for Request Tracker (RT) ticket management	MCP server for the Opendock dock scheduling and warehouse management API.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-request-tracker": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-request-tracker-crunchtools"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "opendock": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "opendock-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons