What is the key difference between MCP Local WP and QueryBear?

MCP Local WP belongs to the Databases category with local stdio execution, while QueryBear belongs to the Databases category with local stdio execution.

How do I install MCP Local WP or QueryBear in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are MCP Local WP and QueryBear free or paid?

MCP Local WP operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). QueryBear operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

MCP Local WP lists 3 tools with 0 views and 30 GitHub stars. QueryBear lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both MCP Local WP and QueryBear together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

MCP Local WP vs QueryBear

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Local WP and QueryBear MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

MCP Local WP

Databases · Local stdio

Quality: 52/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required

QueryBear

Databases · Local stdio

Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose MCP Local WP if you need specialized Databases tools running via a local process. Choose QueryBear if your workspace requires Databases integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Local WP when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Primary tools included: sql, params, table.

Explore MCP Local WP Details

Choose QueryBear when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore QueryBear Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	M MCP Local WP Databases	Q QueryBear Databases
Summary	WordPress database access via Local by Flywheel. Execute read-only MySQL queries and inspect schema.	Safe, read-only Postgres and MySQL access for AI agents. Audit log + column-level controls.
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

MCP Local WP Tools (3)

sql

params

table

QueryBear Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

MCP Local WP Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-local-wp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@verygoodplugins/mcp-local-wp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

QueryBear Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "querybear": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "querybear"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

MCP Local WP is categorized under Databases and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, QueryBear belongs to Databases using local stdio subprocess. Select MCP Local WP when you need capabilities focused on databases and QueryBear when you require tools for databases.

More alternatives to MCP Local WP More alternatives to QueryBear Databases category hub