MCP Isap vs Ch Eli MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Isap and Ch Eli MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

M

Choose MCP Isap when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP Isap Details

Choose Ch Eli MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ch Eli MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	M MCP Isap Developer Tools	Ch Eli MCP Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for Polish legislation (Dziennik Ustaw / Monitor Polski) via Sejm ELI API.	MCP server for Swiss federal legislation via Fedlex (native ELI), verifiable citations.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-isap": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@matematicsolutions/mcp-isap"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ch-eli-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "ch-eli-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons