MCP Apollo vs Outlook Assistant

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Apollo and Outlook Assistant MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Apollo when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: apollo_search_people, apollo_enrich_person, apollo_search_companies.

Explore MCP Apollo Details

Choose Outlook Assistant when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Email search with conversation threading and batch actions, Email sending with dry-run previews and recipient allowlist, Export emails in Markdown, EML, JSON, CSV, MBOX, or HTML formats.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Apollo Communication	Outlook Assistant littlebearapps Communication
Summary
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-apollo": {
      "url": "https://YOUR_WORKER_URL/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "littlebearapps-outlook-assistant": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@littlebearapps/outlook-assistant"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons