MCP Ap2 vs NotFair

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Ap2 and NotFair MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Ap2 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP Ap2 Details

Choose NotFair when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore NotFair Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Ap2 Developer Tools	NotFair Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for AP2 — Google's Agent-to-Agent Payment Protocol (authorization, audit, trust)	Google Ads MCP - analyze performance, manage keywords, bids, and campaigns.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-ap2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@codespar/mcp-itau@alpha"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "notfair": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "notfair@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons