Mcp vs Location and Timezone MCP Server by RoxyAPI

In-depth architectural comparison of the Mcp and Location and Timezone MCP Server by RoxyAPI MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Mcp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Mcp Details

L

Choose Location and Timezone MCP Server by RoxyAPI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Location and Timezone MCP Server by RoxyAPI Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Mcp Developer Tools	L Location and Timezone MCP Server by RoxyAPI Developer Tools
Summary	Local-first visual regression for AI agents: verdicts, diff images, explain_snapshot. No API key.	City geocoding and timezone resolution for birth data, for AI agents, one API key.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-33": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-33"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "location-and-timezone-mcp-server-by-roxyapi": {
      "url": "https://roxyapi.com/products/location-api"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons