Leadhound API vs Yandex Audience MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Leadhound API and Yandex Audience MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

L

Choose Leadhound API when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Customer Data Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Leadhound API Details

Choose Yandex Audience MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Customer Data Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Yandex Audience MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	L Leadhound API Customer Data Platforms	Yandex Audience MCP Customer Data Platforms
Summary	Sales prospecting and lead generation from Google reviews: local businesses leaking leads, scored.	MCP server for Yandex Audience API: segments (CRM, lookalike, pixel), pixels, grants.
Category & Scope	Customer Data Platforms	Customer Data Platforms

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "leadhound-api": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "leadhound-api"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "yandex-audience-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-yandex-audience@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons