Leadhound API vs Sf Intelligence

In-depth architectural comparison of the Leadhound API and Sf Intelligence MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

L

Choose Leadhound API when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Customer Data Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Leadhound API Details

Choose Sf Intelligence when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Customer Data Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sf Intelligence Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	L Leadhound API Customer Data Platforms	Sf Intelligence Customer Data Platforms
Summary	Sales prospecting and lead generation from Google reviews: local businesses leaking leads, scored.	Offline, read-only MCP knowledge base for one Salesforce org's metadata, deps & impact.
Category & Scope	Customer Data Platforms	Customer Data Platforms

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "leadhound-api": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "leadhound-api"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sf-intelligence": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sf-intelligence"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons