LayUp Sports Booking vs SpriteCook

In-depth architectural comparison of the LayUp Sports Booking and SpriteCook MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

L

Choose LayUp Sports Booking when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore LayUp Sports Booking Details

Choose SpriteCook when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SpriteCook Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	L LayUp Sports Booking Gaming	SpriteCook Gaming
Summary	Search bookable London courts, pitches, lanes and pickup games across every major UK provider.	Generate game assets with AI for 2D games, including sprites, tilesets, and animations.
Category & Scope	Gaming	Gaming
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "layup-sports-booking": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "layup-sports-booking"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "spritecook": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "spritecook-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons