Lawstronaut vs Aidocx MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Lawstronaut and Aidocx MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Lawstronaut when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_jurisdictions, list_domains, domain.

Explore Lawstronaut Details

Choose Aidocx MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: create_document, upload_document, list_documents.

Explore Aidocx MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Lawstronaut Legal	Aidocx MCP Legal
Summary	Connect AI to millions of laws and court cases with the Lawstronaut MCP.	Create, upload, and manage contracts from AI assistants. AI analysis and e-signatures.
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lawstronaut-2": {
      "url": "https://mcp.lawstronaut.com"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-server-86": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "aidocx-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons