Lahend.ee — Estonian court decisions vs Melta UI

In-depth architectural comparison of the Lahend.ee — Estonian court decisions and Melta UI MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Lahend.ee — Estonian court decisions when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lahend.ee — Estonian court decisions Details

Choose Melta UI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Melta UI Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Lahend.ee — Estonian court decisions Legal	Melta UI Legal
Summary	Estonian court decisions: full-text case-law search, each ruling linked to its companies. Free.	AI-Ready design system MCP: melta UI tokens, component contracts, 99 rules, check_html self-verify
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lahend-ee-estonian-court-decisions": {
      "url": "https://lahend.ee/api/lahend-mcp/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "melta-ui": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "melta-ds-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons