Keryx vs BountyVerdict Agent Decision Tools

In-depth architectural comparison of the Keryx and BountyVerdict Agent Decision Tools MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Keryx when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Keryx Details

Choose BountyVerdict Agent Decision Tools when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore BountyVerdict Agent Decision Tools Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Keryx Finance & Fintech	BountyVerdict Agent Decision Tools Finance & Fintech
Summary	Autonomous research agent that pays every source it cites in USDC on Arc via x402 micropayments.	Paid GitHub and MCP decision tools for autonomous agents, settled in USDC via x402.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "keryx": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "keryx-mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bountyverdict-agent-decision-tools-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons