BountyVerdict Agent Decision Tools vs Keryx

In-depth architectural comparison of the BountyVerdict Agent Decision Tools and Keryx MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose BountyVerdict Agent Decision Tools when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore BountyVerdict Agent Decision Tools Details

Choose Keryx when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Keryx Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	BountyVerdict Agent Decision Tools Finance & Fintech	Keryx Finance & Fintech
Summary	Paid GitHub and MCP decision tools for autonomous agents, settled in USDC via x402.	Autonomous research agent that pays every source it cites in USDC on Arc via x402 micropayments.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bountyverdict-agent-decision-tools-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "keryx": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "keryx-mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons