Kops vs Proximo

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
K
Kops
kaka-milan-22
☁️ Cloud Platforms
Proximo
john-broadway
☁️ Cloud Platforms
SummaryRead-only kubectl for Claude Code: returns structured JSON, hardcoded safe verbs (no mutation path even with malicious input), Secret/ConfigMap values never returned, plus one-shot cluster triage & inventory.All four Proxmox surfaces — VE, Backup Server, Mail Gateway, Datacenter Manager — plus in-container exec on one audited control plane. Every mutation dry-runs to a PLAN with its blast radius named, snapshots first where the platform can, and lands in a hash-chained tamper-evident audit ledger. 365 tools, read-only by default. uvx proximo-proxmox
Quality signal21/100 (Emerging)29/100 (Emerging)
Install pathnpx · lowuvx · high
Engagement 0 0 0 2 0 0 19
ToolsNot listed yetNot listed yet
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView KopsView Proximo
More alternatives to KopsMore alternatives to ProximoCloud Platforms categoryCanonical compare URL

Other servers like Kops