john-broadway/proximo

☁️ Cloud Platforms
0 Views
0 Installs

🐍 🏠 - All four Proxmox surfaces β€” VE, Backup Server, Mail Gateway, Datacenter Manager β€” plus in-container exec on one audited control plane. Every mutation dry-runs to a PLAN with its blast radius named, snapshots first where the platform can, and lands in a hash-chained tamper-evident audit ledger. 365 tools, read-only by default. uvx proximo-proxmox

Quick Install

One-Click IDE Configuration
claude_desktop_config.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "john-broadway-proximo": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "john-broadway-proximo"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Or

Using an AI coding agent (Claude Code, Cursor, etc.)? Copy a ready-made prompt that tells it to fetch the setup instructions and install this server for you.

Documentation Overview

Proximo

CI CodeQL Release PyPI Python 3.12+ License Apache-2.0

OpenSSF Scorecard OpenSSF Best Practices Glama score LobeHub β€” grade, tools, prompts

Enter the ludus β†— Β· Quickstart Β· Setup Β· Trust layer Β· Demo Β· Tools Β· Install Β· Security Β· Docs

Named for Proximo, the lanista of Gladiator. The story is the design, joint for joint.

He armed his fighter with exactly what he needed, never more. He answered for every move in the arena. A lanista, not a jailer.

The Spaniard doesn't get his name up front. He earns it, by conduct, on the record. The helmet comes off: truth said plainly, at cost. That's the "not yet proven, said plainly" section below, and AGENTS.md leading with Proximo's own sharp edges.

His last act opened the cages, holding the wooden sword of his own freedom. A tool should hope to end that well.

"Win the crowd and you will win your freedom."

The others make you choose. A read-only inspector that's safe because it can't touch anything. Or a loaded gun aimed at a cluster you care about.

Proximo refuses the trade. Every dangerous move is planned: see the blast radius first. Every move is proven: a tamper-evident record. And undoable wherever the platform can snapshot: it snapshots before it acts.

Trust built into the substrate, not bolted on after. Hand an AI agent the keys; keep the receipts.

Sovereign and agent-agnostic. Your metal, your token, a ledger you own. No cloud, no phone-home, no standing server unless you opt in.

Don't take our word for any of it. Verify it yourself.

Verify in 60 seconds β€” three receipts, no trust required
# 1. The tool count is real β€” ask the server itself, cold (=> 900).
#    (in a clone of this repo, after `uv sync`)
uv run python -c "import asyncio; from proximo import server; \
print(len(asyncio.run(server.mcp.list_tools())))"

# 2. The container image is what the repo built β€” sigstore provenance (exit 0 = verified):
gh attestation verify oci://ghcr.io/john-broadway/proximo:latest --owner john-broadway

# 3. The security posture is graded by a third party, not by us:
#    https://scorecard.dev/viewer/?uri=github.com/john-broadway/proximo

The rest is in VERIFY.md: forge a ledger byte and watch verify() refuse, grep the outbound surface for phone-home (there is none). These checks work on any tool, from any vendor. Demand them everywhere.


Proximo architecture: MCP clients (stdio and Streamable HTTP), A2A, and HTTP/OpenAPI clients all land on one governed spine, pass the trust spine (PLAN, PROVE, UNDO, DIAGNOSE), sit on the Proxmox-enforced token floor, and reach four products β€” PVE, PBS, PMG, PDM

Every transport enters one governed dispatch and crosses the same trust spine; the token floor beneath it all is enforced by Proxmox itself. Watch it hold, live, in the Demo.

What it does

Ask, in plain English: "why is ct 105 thrashing?" An AI agent pulls node and guest status, tails the logs, and runs a diagnostic inside the container to find out.

If there's a fix, it shows you the plan before it touches anything. Snapshots first. Applies. Hands you a signed receipt of exactly what changed.

That's the product: a hypervisor an AI can operate without being able to wreck it.

Read-only by default. No mutation runs on the first call: it returns its blast radius as a plan for you to see first. A tamper-evident receipt for every change.

The comparison isn't Proximo vs. the GUI. It's Proximo vs. handing an LLM your root token and hoping.

Quickstart

// your MCP client config (Claude Desktop / Claude Code / Cursor / …)
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "proximo": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["proximo-proxmox"],
      "env": {
        "PROXIMO_API_BASE_URL": "https://your-pve:8006/api2/json",
        "PROXIMO_NODE": "your-node",
        "PROXIMO_TOKEN_PATH": "/path/to/token-file"   // USER@REALM!TOKENID=SECRET β€” by reference, never inlined
      }
    }
  }
}

Or install with one click:

Install in VS Code Install in Cursor

Both prompt for the token file path; the secret never lands in client config. No token yet? uvx proximo-proxmox mint prints the least-privilege runbook.

Then preflight what your token can actually do (read-only):

uvx proximo-proxmox doctor

Start with a read-only token. Proximo is useful long before you grant it write. Full token-first walkthrough: docs/SETUP.md Β· more install paths: Install & run.

Why Proximo exists

The Proxmox MCP landscape is split. API-based servers manage nodes and VMs but structurally cannot run a command inside an LXC: the REST API has no exec endpoint. SSH-based servers can, through broad shell access with little scoping.

Proximo builds the principled whole. Both halves, one audited surface, least-privilege. Trust by construction:

Read-only inspectorFull-access executorProximo
Can mutateno β€” that's the safetyyesyes β€” plan recorded first, then confirm=true
Preview before a changen/ararelydefault β€” blast radius + live state, every mutation
Record of what happenednoapp logs, editablekeyed hash-chained ledger, tamper-evident, on by default
Undon/araresnapshot-first, wherever the platform can snapshot
Command inside an LXCnobroad SSHopt-in, fail-closed CTID allowlist
Products coveredusually PVEusually PVEPVE + PBS + PMG + PDM β€” one audited plane
Verify the artifact you runvariesvariessigned image Β· PyPI provenance Β· SBOM Β· Scorecard

(The archetype columns describe the split above, not any specific project. There is no official Proxmox MCP; Proximo is a community project, standing on its own.)

The trust layer β€” what makes Proximo different

Four controls on by default:

ControlWhat it does
PLANEvery mutation first returns a recorded preview β€” the exact change, live state, blast radius, an advisory risk rating. Nothing mutates without its plan recorded; one confirm=true call records and performs.
PROVEKeyed (HMAC-SHA256), hash-chained audit ledger β€” audit_verify catches edits, reordering, insertion. Pin the head off-box (expected_head) to catch truncation too: that's the strong guarantee, and it's opt-in.
UNDOSnapshot-first, fail-closed where the platform can snapshot: auto-snapshot before risky exec, config-revert, pve_rollback. Planes with no snapshot primitive (firewall/SDN/ACL) have no rollback β€” said plainly.
DIAGNOSERead-only evidence battery + node health β†’ advisory flags that surface incompleteness too, so an empty list never reads as a false clean bill.

Six more ship off until you configure them β€” per-plan CONSENT, a CONTAIN kill-switch, an arm-LEASE, an arm-time SCOPE, a FORBID/RATE ENVELOPE, and TAINT (the prompt-injection mitigation). What each one actually defends against: SECURITY.md.

Honesty note (load-bearing): risk ratings are an advisory heuristic, not a sandbox β€” LOW means "no state change," not "safe," and the absence of a HIGH flag is not a safety signal. Review every change yourself. The floor beneath it all is the token you mint: Proxmox RBAC holds even if Proximo's process is fully compromised β€” a stronger guarantee than anything Proximo's own code provides. Scope it to exactly what you mean to grant: SECURITY.md.

Hold any tool to this, including this one: The Keys Test. Ten questions to ask before you hand an AI agent real infrastructure. Proximo's own scorecard published, partials included.

And watch the spine hold, live:

Hand-the-keys demo: an agent asks for a purge-delete and gets a PLAN with the blast radius instead of a wipe, a snapshot lands before the reversible change, and audit_verify proves the ledger β€” an edited copy breaks at the exact line

41 seconds, recorded live with a write-scoped token on a throwaway guest β€” real mutations, real receipts, nothing staged. Reproduce it: scripts/demo/hand_the_keys.py --live.

Demo

The record defends itself:

Ledger tamper demo: three agent moves land in the keyed hash-chained ledger; an in-place edit breaks audit_verify at the exact line (ok=False); a truncation that fools the forward walk is caught by the pinned head

Three agent moves land in the ledger; one entry gets edited in place β€” audit_verify() breaks at the exact line, ok=False; the truncation a forward walk would miss is caught against the pinned head. Source: docs/demo/ledger-tamper.cast Β· run the checks yourself: VERIFY.md.

A second cut: doctor preflight, a destructive delete answered with a PLAN, the ledger verifying clean. Recorded live against real PVE 9.2 with a read-only token: docs/demo/demo.svg Β· scripts/demo/demo.py.

Surfaces & tools β€” one control plane

SurfaceBackendFor
Proxmox VEREST API + scoped tokennode/guest lifecycle, storage, SDN, identity, HA, firewall
Proxmox Backup ServerREST API + scoped tokendatastores, namespaces, snapshots, sync, GC, verify, tape
Proxmox Mail GatewayTicket authmail flow, quarantine, filtering rules, domains, services
Proxmox Datacenter ManagerAPI tokenfederated fleet β€” reads plus governed control (power/snapshot/migrate, dry-run-first)
Container execssh β†’ pct execrun-command-in-container, psql, log tailing β€” what the API structurally can't do

Those backends are deliberately boring. Anyone can call them. The product is the trust layer over them.

900 tools is an estate, not a starting point β€” and you only carry the part you use. One env var sets your floor: PROXIMO_TOOLSETS=dynamic serves 3 search tools with all 900 still callable (~555 tokens of context), one domain like pve.guests runs ~8,900, a whole plane ~97,000. The estate is 900. The doorway is yours to size. Coverage and context stopped being the same number.

Where an operator actually starts:

You want to…Start withWorth knowing
See the whole cluster at oncepve_cluster_resources, pve_list_guestsone call, every node
Find out why a container is sickct_diagnose, ct_logs, pve_guest_statusread-only evidence battery
Preflight a token / configproximo doctor (CLI) or pve_doctor, pve_overbroad_grantsrun this before wiring an agent
Power / lifecyclepve_guest_powerreturns a PLAN first β€” nothing moves without confirm=true
Snapshot before touching anythingpve_snapshot_create, pve_rollbackUNDO's foundation
Check backups are actually freshpve_backup_freshness, pbs_snapshots_listwalks real archives β€” "task OK" is never evidence
Run a command in a containerct_execopt-in (PROXIMO_ENABLE_EXEC=1), fail-closed allowlist
Trace / release mailpmg_tracker_list, pmg_quarantine_spamfull PMG plane behind it
Operate the federated fleetpdm_resources_list, pdm_pve_lxc_listgoverned control, dry-run-first
Prove the record wasn't touchedaudit_verifyregistered on every surface, always

Every tool with typed inputs: docs/TOOLS.md Β· sizing the surface to your model: docs/SETUP.md.

Install & run

πŸ“¦ 0.26.0 β€” on PyPI, GitHub, and GHCR (signed multi-arch image).

New in 0.26.0 β€” the surface stops costing what it covers. ~348k tokens of schema crossed to every client before a question β€” 84k of it one parameter description repeated on 899 of 900 tools. Slimmed to ~276k, then made non-resident: PROXIMO_TOOLSETS=dynamic serves 3 search tools at ~555 tokens, all 900 still callable through the same governed dispatch; toolsets scope 23 domains, PROXIMO_TOOLS pins exact names. PROVE records the interval β€” a mutation killed mid-flight leaves an executing entry instead of no trace. Lists answer counted + lean ({total, by_status, rows}): the 12B that counted 19 of 28 guests now answers 28/18/10.

Recent: 0.25.0 β€” the PMG plane closes; a fourth transport arrives: 715 β†’ 900 tools. See SECURITY.md for what each control honestly holds.

Proximo runs on your machine, on demand. No daemon, no open port.

uvx proximo-proxmox            # zero-install run (PyPI package: proximo-proxmox; command stays `proximo`)
# or: pip install proximo-proxmox            the MCP core
# or: pip install "proximo-proxmox[a2a]"     + the optional A2A face
# or: pip install "proximo-proxmox[http]"    + the optional HTTP/OpenAPI face
# or: pip install "proximo-proxmox[mcp-http]" + the optional MCP-over-streamable-HTTP face
# or, from source:  git clone https://github.com/john-broadway/proximo.git && cd proximo && uv pip install -e .

Wire it into your MCP client as the command proximo, with the PROXIMO_* env vars β€” see packaging/proximo.env.example.

Docker (GHCR): docker run -i --rm … ghcr.io/john-broadway/proximo:latest. Multi-arch, SBOM, sigstore-signed provenance (gh attestation verify oci://ghcr.io/john-broadway/proximo --owner john-broadway). Mirrored to Docker Hub (docker.io/jebroadway/proximo, identical digest); GHCR stays the signed primary.

Safe by default: API-only out of the box. The two near-root edges are opt-in and say so loudly: LXC exec (PROXIMO_ENABLE_EXEC=1, near-root on the host) and the qemu-guest-agent edge (PROXIMO_ENABLE_AGENT=1, near-root in a guest). Each is scoped by its own fail-closed allowlist.

Big surface, scoped context: you don't have to load the whole estate. PROXIMO_SURFACES=pve,exec registers only those planes (that pair = 314 tools). Unpicked planes never touch your context window. audit_verify always stays. A typo'd surface refuses startup.

The network faces (experimental, opt-in): proximo-a2a speaks Agent2Agent. proximo-http serves plain HTTP + generated /openapi.json for no-code clients. proximo-mcp-http serves MCP itself over Streamable HTTP (the SDK's native transport) for networked MCP clients: no third-party stdio→HTTP bridge, so the perimeter stays Proximo's.

All three serve the full surface through the same spine as MCP. No second code path; trust spine and token scope inherited. Fail-closed perimeter: loopback, bearer-token required off-localhost, DNS-rebind and CSRF defended. Details: SECURITY.md.

At scale

One container is the demo. A cluster is the point.

  • The whole cluster in one call. pve_cluster_resources: every VM, node, storage pool, SDN object.
  • One tamper-evident record across every node. "Show me every state-changing action this month, and prove the log wasn't touched" becomes a query you can actually answer. No human at the CLI walks away with that.
  • Where the time comes back. On one node a senior at the CLI is faster, and that's fine. Across a dozen nodes and hundreds of guests, a bounded, audited agent earns its keep.

Many boxes, one Proximo: register remotes in a TOML file (secrets by reference, never inlined), point PROXIMO_TARGETS at it, aim any tool with proximo_target="edge-pve". The target travels with the call. PLAN and EXECUTE hit the same box, the ledger records which, cross-plane calls error. Config shape: packaging/targets.example.toml.

Status β€” the arena record

  • 🩸 0.26.0 β€” the surface stops costing what it covers: an outside report said Proximo was unusable on a local model. Right, and worse than reported β€” ~348k tokens of schema before a question, 84k of it one repeated sentence. Now non-resident: dynamic serves 3 search tools at ~555 tokens, all 900 still callable; list responses answer counted + lean (a 12B that miscounted 19 of 28 guests now answers 28/18/10). The 3-step dynamic loop still strains small models.

Every release before it β€” every pillar, every redteam, every fix β€” lives in CHANGELOG.md.

The numbers, honestly: 900 MCP tools, proved in two deliberate layers. 11,000+ in-process tests (ruff + pyright clean) pin every tool's shape. A separate live-smoke harness drives real Proxmox hardware: a 3-node PVE 9.2 cluster, PBS 4.2, PMG 9.1, PDM 1.1.4, a real cross-datacenter move. The two are kept apart on purpose: passing shape tests never gets to masquerade as "works on a real host." And this workspace administers its own Proxmox estate through Proximo daily (dogfood). The blast-radius engine carries the destructive surface: across eleven op-classes it names the specific guests, nodes, principals, or disks at risk. Nothing falls back to a bare confirm.

Proven live (not mocks): the trust spine end-to-end; identity/storage/SDN/firewall/HA create→read→delete with the ledger verified throughout; offline + online live-migration and HA fencing (softdog) on a real 3-node cluster; full PBS/PMG/PDM planes including a real cross-datacenter move. Not yet proven — said plainly: hardware-watchdog fencing (needs physical iTCO/IPMI) and behavior at production scale. The unrecoverable ops (SDN apply, etc.) are deliberately never fired live: proven by plan, held back by design, not a gap. Per-surface detail: CHANGELOG.md.

Documentation

DocumentWhat it answers
SetupToken-first walkthrough: mint a least-privilege token, verify it, widen deliberately.
VerifyEvery trust claim paired with the command that proves it β€” run them cold.
SecurityThe two-deployment trust model, all ten controls, what each honestly holds, reporting.
Threat modelWhat Proximo defends against, what it doesn't, where the boundaries sit.
ToolsAll 900 tools, grouped by surface, typed inputs.
AgentsThe page written for the agent itself β€” Proximo's sharp edges, stated first.
Known issuesWhat's broken or odd right now, said plainly.
ContributingDev setup, the CI gates, what a PR is expected to keep intact.
ChangelogEvery release, every redteam, every fix β€” the full build history.

License

Apache-2.0 β€” chosen for the patent grant that suits infrastructure tooling. Full text in LICENSE.

Credits

Built by John Broadway with Claude and Maude β€” a human–AI partnership, and the first thing we made on this box to give away to the world. Claude Opus 4.8 built the trust pillars and the original tool surface and has carried the work since; Claude Fable 5 ran the 101-agent release audit and the first publish. Every commit carries its co-author trailer. And to meyergru, who put a real measurement on the table instead of an opinion β€” the context-cost work above exists because of that report.


"Are you not entertained?" β€” stars, issues, and sparring partners welcome. Strength and honor. βš”οΈ

Related MCP Servers

4everland/4everland-hosting-mcp

πŸŽ–οΈ πŸ“‡ 🏠 🍎 🐧 - An MCP server implementation for 4EVERLAND Hosting enabling instant deployment of AI-generated code to decentralized storage networks like Greenfield, IPFS, and Arweave.

☁️ Cloud Platforms0 views
aashari/mcp-server-aws-sso

πŸ“‡ ☁️ 🏠 - AWS Single Sign-On (SSO) integration enabling AI systems to securely interact with AWS resources by initiating SSO login, listing accounts/roles, and executing AWS CLI commands using temporary credentials.

☁️ Cloud Platforms0 views
agentmetal/mcp

πŸŽ–οΈ πŸ“‡ ☁️ - Provision, SSH into, run commands on, and manage Linux VPSes from an agent β€” pay USDC over x402 or by card over HTTP 402, a running box in under 60s. No signup, no API key to buy.

☁️ Cloud Platforms0 views
alexbakers/mcp-ipfs

πŸ“‡ ☁️ - upload and manipulation of IPFS storage

☁️ Cloud Platforms0 views

Engagement

Views
0
Installs
0
Upvotes
0

Views and upvotes are unique per visitor network (hashed IP). Installs count copy actions.

Status

Health: Not checked yet

We have not completed a health check for this listing yet.

No check timestamp yet.

Unclaimed listing (imported or pending owner verification). Claim it β†’
β˜… Spotlight Slot

Feature Your MCP Server

Get maximum visibility for your server across our directory, search results, and detail pages.

Spotlight Your Server

Own this project?

This directory is pre-filled from public sources. Claim via GitHub README, site badge, or DNS TXT to get the verified badge and attach your website.

Claim this listing

Promote this listing

Optional paid placement. Free listings stay free forever.

Share & Embed

Add our SVG badge (dark/light directory styles) or embeddable widget to your site.