Kaalshodh — Indian astronomy time machine vs Orbit

In-depth architectural comparison of the Kaalshodh — Indian astronomy time machine and Orbit MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

K

Choose Kaalshodh — Indian astronomy time machine when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kaalshodh — Indian astronomy time machine Details

Choose Orbit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Orbit Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	K Kaalshodh — Indian astronomy time machine Aerospace & Astrodynamics	Orbit Aerospace & Astrodynamics
Summary	Observatory-grade Indian astronomy, years -5000..+5000: positions, eclipses, panchang date search.	Orbit's local-first task and workflow registry for coding agents.
Category & Scope	Aerospace & Astrodynamics	Aerospace & Astrodynamics

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kaalshodh-indian-astronomy-time-machine": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "kaalshodh-indian-astronomy-time-machine"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "orbit-4": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@orbit-tools/cli@"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons