Scorezilla MCP vs MCP Stockfish

In-depth architectural comparison of the Scorezilla MCP and MCP Stockfish MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Scorezilla MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Paid Service).
• You have access to required keys: SCOREZILLA_TOKEN.
• Primary tools included: list_games, list_boards, get_keys.

Explore Scorezilla MCP Details

Choose MCP Stockfish when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: command, session_id.

Explore MCP Stockfish Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Scorezilla MCP isco-tec Gaming	MCP Stockfish sonirico Gaming
Summary
Category & Scope	Gaming	Gaming
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "isco-tec-scorezilla-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@scorezilla/mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "SCOREZILLA_TOKEN": "YOUR_SCOREZILLA_TOKEN_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sonirico-mcp-stockfish": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sonirico-mcp-stockfish"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons