Inflow vs Kilo IoT Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Inflow and Kilo IoT Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Inflow when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Inflow Details

Choose Kilo IoT Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kilo IoT Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Inflow Developer Tools	Kilo IoT Server Developer Tools
Summary	MCP Server for agents to onboard, pay, and provision services autonomously with InFlow	Read, provision and control real IoT devices, rules and alarms on a live Kilo deployment.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "inflow-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kilo-iot-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "kilo-iot-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons