Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Inflow vs Valet
In-depth architectural comparison of the Inflow and Valet MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Inflow
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 43/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Valet
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 41/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Inflow if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Valet if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
I
Choose Inflow when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
V
Choose Valet when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Freemium).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Inflow Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Valet Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Inflow Configuration
Valet Configuration