Inflow vs Jobber MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Inflow and Jobber MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Inflow when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Inflow Details

Choose Jobber MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Jobber MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Inflow Developer Tools	Jobber MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	MCP Server for agents to onboard, pay, and provision services autonomously with InFlow	MCP server for Jobber (home services SaaS) — exposes tools for clients, jobs, invoices, and quote...
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "inflow-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "jobber-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "jobber-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons