In-depth architectural comparison of the Hook Detector and Video URL Analyzer MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Hook Detector
Social Media · Local stdio
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Video URL Analyzer
Social Media · Local stdio
Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Hook Detector if you need specialized Social Media tools running via a local process. Choose Video URL Analyzer if your workspace requires Social Media integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
H
Choose Hook Detector when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Hook Detector is categorized under Social Media and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Video URL Analyzer belongs to Social Media using local stdio subprocess. Select Hook Detector when you need capabilities focused on social media and Video URL Analyzer when you require tools for social media.