Hjarni vs Kanera

In-depth architectural comparison of the Hjarni and Kanera MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

H

Choose Hjarni when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Hjarni Details

Choose Kanera when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kanera Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	H Hjarni Knowledge & Memory	Kanera Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Markdown-based note-taking with a hosted MCP server. Your notes serve you and your AI.	Manage Kanera workspaces, boards, cards, notes, comments, labels, custom fields, and activity.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hjarni": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "hjarni"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kanera": {
      "url": "https://board.kanera.app/signup"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons