HasData Facebook vs PlanVortex

In-depth architectural comparison of the HasData Facebook and PlanVortex MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

H

Choose HasData Facebook when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore HasData Facebook Details

Choose PlanVortex when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore PlanVortex Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	H HasData Facebook Social Media	PlanVortex Social Media
Summary	Public Facebook pages and profiles with likes, followers, contact details and posts, as JSON.	Schedule posts, read comments and answer messages across eleven social networks.
Category & Scope	Social Media	Social Media
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hasdata-facebook": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "hasdata-facebook"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "planvortex": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "planvortex-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons