HasData Facebook vs Pendpost

In-depth architectural comparison of the HasData Facebook and Pendpost MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

H

Choose HasData Facebook when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore HasData Facebook Details

Choose Pendpost when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Pendpost Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	H HasData Facebook Social Media	Pendpost Social Media
Summary	Public Facebook pages and profiles with likes, followers, contact details and posts, as JSON.	Local-first social MCP: an agent drafts and schedules posts; you approve before anything publishes.
Category & Scope	Social Media	Social Media
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hasdata-facebook": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "hasdata-facebook"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pendpost": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "pendpost"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons