Google Trends API vs Sentry MCP Rs

In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Trends API and Sentry MCP Rs MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

G

Choose Google Trends API when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Trends API Details

Choose Sentry MCP Rs when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (BYOK (Pay Provider Direct)).
• You have access to required keys: SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN, SENTRY_HOST, SOCKS_PROXY, HTTPS_PROXY.
• Primary tools included: issue_url, organization_slug, issue_id.

Explore Sentry MCP Rs Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	G Google Trends API Monitoring	Sentry MCP Rs utapyngo Monitoring
Summary	Google Trends search interest over time with growth metrics. Free key at trendsapi.ai	Fast and minimal Sentry MCP server written in Rust
Category & Scope	Monitoring	Monitoring

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-trends-api-2": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "google-trends-client"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "utapyngo-sentry-mcp-rs": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector"
      ],
      "env": {
        "SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN": "YOUR_SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN_HERE",
        "SENTRY_HOST": "YOUR_SENTRY_HOST_HERE",
        "SOCKS_PROXY": "YOUR_SOCKS_PROXY_HERE",
        "HTTPS_PROXY": "YOUR_HTTPS_PROXY_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons