Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Last9 MCP Server vs Sentry MCP Rs
In-depth architectural comparison of the Last9 MCP Server and Sentry MCP Rs MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Last9 MCP Server
Monitoring · Local stdio
Quality: 60/100 (Good) | Auth: API Key required
Sentry MCP Rs
Monitoring · Local stdio
Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: API Key required
Verdict Summary: Choose Last9 MCP Server if you need specialized Monitoring tools running via a local process. Choose Sentry MCP Rs if your workspace requires Monitoring integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Last9 MCP Server when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Freemium).
- You have access to required keys:
LAST9_REFRESH_TOKEN. - Primary tools included: start_time_iso, end_time_iso, time_iso.
Choose Sentry MCP Rs when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
- You have access to required keys:
SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN, SENTRY_HOST, SOCKS_PROXY, HTTPS_PROXY. - Primary tools included: issue_url, organization_slug, issue_id.
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Last9 MCP Server Tools (80)
start_time_iso
end_time_iso
time_iso
lookback_minutes
limit
service_name
span_name
env
sort_by
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Last9 MCP Server Configuration
Sentry MCP Rs Configuration