Google Forms MCP vs Mfukushim Map Traveler Mcp

In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Forms MCP and Mfukushim Map Traveler Mcp MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

G

Choose Google Forms MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Forms MCP Details

Choose Mfukushim Map Traveler Mcp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Mfukushim Map Traveler Mcp Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	G Google Forms MCP Developer Tools	Mfukushim Map Traveler Mcp Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for the Google Forms API: create forms, manage questions, read responses and watches.	Create immersive travel experiences by instructing an avatar to navigate Google Maps. Report on th…
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-forms-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "google-forms-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mfukushim-map-traveler-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@mfukushim/map-traveler-mcp@0.0.81"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons