Google CrUX MCP vs Mfukushim Map Traveler Mcp

In-depth architectural comparison of the Google CrUX MCP and Mfukushim Map Traveler Mcp MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

G

Choose Google CrUX MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google CrUX MCP Details

Choose Mfukushim Map Traveler Mcp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Mfukushim Map Traveler Mcp Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	G Google CrUX MCP Developer Tools	Mfukushim Map Traveler Mcp Developer Tools
Summary	Real-user Core Web Vitals from the Chrome UX Report (CrUX) API for any origin or URL.	Create immersive travel experiences by instructing an avatar to navigate Google Maps. Report on th…
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-crux-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "google-crux-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mfukushim-map-traveler-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@mfukushim/map-traveler-mcp@0.0.81"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons