Ghost Publisher vs Opendock

In-depth architectural comparison of the Ghost Publisher and Opendock MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Ghost Publisher when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ghost Publisher Details

Choose Opendock when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Opendock Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Ghost Publisher Developer Tools	Opendock Developer Tools
Summary	Local-first MCP server for safe Ghost authoring, diagnostics, scheduling, and publishing.	MCP server for the Opendock dock scheduling and warehouse management API.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ghost-publisher-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ghost-publisher-mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "opendock": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "opendock-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons