Mcp Linux Tools vs Terminal History Mcp

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
Mcp Linux Tools logo
Mcp Linux Tools
gerard-kanters
🖥️ Command Line
Terminal History Mcp logo
🖥️ Command Line
SummaryAdminister a Linux server from an MCP client such as Cursor or VS Code: read files and tail logs, check/reload/restart systemd services, manage cron jobs inside a dedicated crontab section, run read-only MySQL queries, drive WP-CLI on WordPress sites, run safe Git commands, and execute sandboxed Python. Directories, services and WordPress sites are allowlisted in config.json, and every tool returns a uniform {success, data, error, meta} response. Runs as a systemd service over HTTP.Full-text search over your shell history (zsh / bash / fish) via SQLite FTS5. Local-only. 11-pattern secret redaction runs BEFORE insert. Captures cwd / exit code / duration via opt-in shell hook. Tools: searchhistory, recentindir, failedcommands, commandchains, reindex.
Quality signal44/100 (Fair)49/100 (Fair)
Install pathuvx · lownpx · high
Engagement 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 4
ToolsNot listed yetFull-text search with SQLite FTS5Local-only storage with secret redaction before insertOptional shell hook to capture cwd, exit code, and durationTools for searching, recent commands by directory, failed commands, and command chainsSupports zsh, bash, and fish shellsEasy integration with MCP clients via stdio
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView Mcp Linux ToolsView Terminal History Mcp
More alternatives to Mcp Linux ToolsMore alternatives to Terminal History McpCommand Line category

Other servers like Mcp Linux Tools