Cloud Audit vs Orihime

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
Cloud Audit
gebalamariusz
🔒 Security
O
Orihime
srinivasan-sundaresan95
🔒 Security
SummaryOpen-source AWS security scanner with attack chain detection, breach cost estimation, and copy-paste remediation (CLI + Terraform). 47 checks, 16 attack chain rules. First free standalone AWS security MCP server.Cross-repository code knowledge graph MCP server for Java, Kotlin, JavaScript, and TypeScript. Indexes source into embedded KuzuDB via tree-sitter; 30+ tools for call-flow tracing, multi-hop taint analysis (OWASP/CWE/PCI/STIG reports), entry-point reachability filtering, performance hotspot detection, and license compliance — without reading source files. 95% fewer tokens vs source-reading baseline. pip install orihime
Quality signal27/100 (Emerging)25/100 (Emerging)
Install pathuvx · highpip · high
Engagement 0 0 0 67 0 0 0 1
ToolsNot listed yetNot listed yet
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView Cloud AuditView Orihime
More alternatives to Cloud AuditMore alternatives to OrihimeSecurity category

Other servers like Cloud Audit