FlightQueue vs ToolTrust Scanner

In-depth architectural comparison of the FlightQueue and ToolTrust Scanner MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

F

Choose FlightQueue when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_airports, get_airport_overview, compare_airports.

Explore FlightQueue Details

Choose ToolTrust Scanner when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: tooltrust_scan_config, tooltrust_scan_server, tooltrust_scanner_scan.

Explore ToolTrust Scanner Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F FlightQueue Developer Tools	ToolTrust Scanner Developer Tools
Summary	Airport security wait times, forecasts, FAA delays, EES border queues and baggage stats.	Scans MCP servers for prompt injection, data exfiltration, and privilege escalation.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "flightqueue": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote",
        "https://mcp.flightqueue.com/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tooltrust-scanner": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons